Hi Steven, On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 06:03:12PM +0800, Steven Lee wrote: > For cleaning up the AST2600 eMMC controller, the reset signal should be > asserted and deasserted before it is probed. > > Signed-off-by: Steven Lee <steven_lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > index 4979f98ffb52..8ef06f32abff 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c [...] > @@ -533,11 +545,22 @@ static struct platform_driver aspeed_sdhci_driver = { > .remove = aspeed_sdhci_remove, > }; > > +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_sdc_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sd-controller", }, > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller", }, > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-sd-controller", .data = &ast2600_sdc_info}, > + { } > +}; > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, aspeed_sdc_of_match); > + > static int aspeed_sdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > struct device_node *parent, *child; > struct aspeed_sdc *sdc; > + const struct of_device_id *match = NULL; > + const struct aspeed_sdc_info *info = NULL; There is no need to initialize these variables to NULL, see below: > int ret; > > sdc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sdc), GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -546,6 +569,23 @@ static int aspeed_sdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > spin_lock_init(&sdc->lock); > > + match = of_match_device(aspeed_sdc_of_match, &pdev->dev); match is set unconditionally before it is used, > + if (!match) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + if (match->data) > + info = match->data; and info could be set unconditionally as well: info = match->data; > + if (info) { > + if (info->flag & PROBE_AFTER_ASSET_DEASSERT) { > + sdc->rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); Please use devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() or devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(). > + if (!IS_ERR(sdc->rst)) { Please just return errors here instead of ignoring them. The reset_control_get_optional variants return NULL in case the device node doesn't contain a resets phandle, in case you really consider this reset to be optional even though the flag is set? > + reset_control_assert(sdc->rst); > + reset_control_deassert(sdc->rst); Is there no need for delays between assertion and deassertion or after the reset is deasserted? > + } > + } > + } > + > sdc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > if (IS_ERR(sdc->clk)) > return PTR_ERR(sdc->clk); In general, I would assert/deassert the reset only after all resources are successfully acquired. This might avoid unnecessary resets in case of probe deferrals. regards Philipp