On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 12:02, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > As indicated by function esdhc_change_pinstate(), SDR50 and DDR50 > require pins_100mhz, while SDR104 and HS400 require pins_200mhz. Some > system design may support SDR50 and DDR50 with 100mhz pin state only > (without 200mhz one). Currently the combined 100/200 MHz pinctrl state > check prevents such system from running SDR50 and DDR50. Separate the > check to support such system design. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied for next, thanks! Kind regards Uffe > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > index a20459744d21..aa45901325b9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > @@ -434,10 +434,10 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg) > * Do not advertise faster UHS modes if there are no > * pinctrl states for 100MHz/200MHz. > */ > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_data->pins_100mhz) || > - IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_data->pins_200mhz)) > - val &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50 > - | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_HS400); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_data->pins_100mhz)) > + val &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_data->pins_200mhz)) > + val &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_HS400); > } > } > > -- > 2.17.1 >
