On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 21:23, Bean Huo <huobean@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The CMD13 polling is only needed for the command with R1B Resp. For the
> command with R1 Resp, such as open-ended multiple block read/write
> (CMD18/25) commands, the device will just wait for its next paired command.
> There is no need to poll device status through CMD13.
>
> Meanwhile, based on the original change commit (mmc: block: Add CMD13 polling
> for MMC IOCTLS with R1B response), and comment in __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(),
> current code is not in line with its original purpose. So fix it with this patch.
>
> Fixes: a0d4c7eb71dd ("mmc: block: Add CMD13 polling for MMC IOCTLS with R1B response")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: Zhan Liu <zliua@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zliua@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied for fixes, thanks!
Note, I took the liberty to rephrase the commit message (and the
header) to clarify things a bit more.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> index 8d3df0be0355..42e27a298218 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_blk_data *md,
>
> memcpy(&(idata->ic.response), cmd.resp, sizeof(cmd.resp));
>
> - if (idata->rpmb || (cmd.flags & MMC_RSP_R1B)) {
> + if (idata->rpmb || (cmd.flags & MMC_RSP_R1B) == MMC_RSP_R1B) {
> /*
> * Ensure RPMB/R1B command has completed by polling CMD13
> * "Send Status".
> --
> 2.17.1
>
