10.11.2020 23:50, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:44:15AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> [...]
>> +static void tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = data;
>> + struct opp_table *opp_table;
>> +
>> + opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
>> + dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
>> + dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int devm_tegra_pwm_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct opp_table *opp_table;
>> + const char *rname = "core";
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* voltage scaling is optional */
>> + if (device_property_present(dev, "core-supply"))
>> + opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &rname, 1);
>> + else
>> + opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(opp_table),
>> + "failed to prepare OPP table\n");
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * OPP table presence is optional and we want the set_rate() of OPP
>> + * API to work similarly to clk_set_rate() if table is missing in a
>> + * device-tree. The add_table() errors out if OPP is missing in DT.
>> + */
>> + if (device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
>> + err = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add OPP table: %d\n", err);
>> + goto put_table;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = devm_add_action(dev, tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table, dev);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto remove_table;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +remove_table:
>> + dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>> +put_table:
>> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> These two functions seem to be heavily boilerplate across all these
> drivers. Have you considered splitting these out into separate helpers?
The helper is already prepared for v2.
