On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 11:39 +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 11:14 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 09:59, Matthias Schiffer > > <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c > > > @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ struct mmc_host *mmc_alloc_host(int extra, > > > struct device *dev) > > > { > > > int err; > > > struct mmc_host *host; > > > + int alias_id, min_idx, max_idx; > > > > > > host = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mmc_host) + extra, > > > GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!host) > > > @@ -395,7 +396,18 @@ struct mmc_host *mmc_alloc_host(int extra, > > > struct device *dev) > > > /* scanning will be enabled when we're ready */ > > > host->rescan_disable = 1; > > > > > > - err = ida_simple_get(&mmc_host_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > > > + host->parent = dev; > > > + > > > + alias_id = mmc_get_reserved_index(host); > > > + if (alias_id >= 0) { > > > + min_idx = alias_id; > > > + max_idx = alias_id + 1; > > > + } else { > > > + min_idx = mmc_first_nonreserved_index(); > > > + max_idx = 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > + err = ida_simple_get(&mmc_host_ida, min_idx, max_idx, > > > GFP_KERNEL); One more question I came across when reworking my patch: Do we need a fallback here for the case where the reserved index is already taken? To handle an SD card being replaced while still mounted? > > > if (err < 0) { > > > kfree(host); > > > return NULL; > > > @@ -406,7 +418,6 @@ struct mmc_host *mmc_alloc_host(int extra, > > > struct device *dev) > > > dev_set_name(&host->class_dev, "mmc%d", host->index); > > > host->ws = wakeup_source_register(NULL, dev_name(&host- > > > > class_dev)); > > > > > > - host->parent = dev; > > > host->class_dev.parent = dev; > > > host->class_dev.class = &mmc_host_class; > > > device_initialize(&host->class_dev); > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > Kind regards > > Uffe