Hi Wolfram,
Thanks for your work.
On 2020-08-17 13:58:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When reading the test description, I thought a correction of the
> xfer_size was tested, which is not the case. It is tested that the
> xfer_size is correct. Use 'proper xfer_size' to remove this ambiguity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For what it's worth,
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This may be bike-shedding and I am not offended if you think it is
> minor. However, I ended up looking at the source wondering where is what
> automatically corrected.
>
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> index c21b3cb71775..152e7525ed33 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c
> @@ -2669,22 +2669,22 @@ static const struct mmc_test_case mmc_test_cases[] = {
> },
>
> {
> - .name = "Correct xfer_size at write (start failure)",
> + .name = "Proper xfer_size at write (start failure)",
> .run = mmc_test_xfersize_write,
> },
>
> {
> - .name = "Correct xfer_size at read (start failure)",
> + .name = "Proper xfer_size at read (start failure)",
> .run = mmc_test_xfersize_read,
> },
>
> {
> - .name = "Correct xfer_size at write (midway failure)",
> + .name = "Proper xfer_size at write (midway failure)",
> .run = mmc_test_multi_xfersize_write,
> },
>
> {
> - .name = "Correct xfer_size at read (midway failure)",
> + .name = "Proper xfer_size at read (midway failure)",
> .run = mmc_test_multi_xfersize_read,
> },
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
