On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, at 05:27, Eddie James wrote: > When calculating the clock divider, start dividing at 2 instead of 1. > The divider is divided by two at the end of the calculation, so starting > at 1 may result in a divider of 0, which shouldn't happen. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>