Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: tmio: Make sure the PM domain is 'started' while probing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 13:35, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > This means dev_pm_domain_start() is needed only for the SDHI renesas
> > variants. But on the other hand, it doesn't hurt for the others (the
> > uniphier-sd variant doesn't even use runtime PM as confirmed by
> > Yamada-san).
> >
> > I don't have a strong opinion, but it looks like we can either apply
> > $subject patch as is, or modify it to make dev_pm_domain_start() be
> > called only for the SDHI renesas variants.
> >
> > What do you prefer?
>
> Dealing with PM is confusing often enough. To keep it simple, I'd
> suggest to avoid unneeded calls. It may take a while later to rediscover
> if this call is essential or not. So, for the uniphier case, we know it
> is not needed. If we agree on a best effort basis that it is also not
> needed for tmio_mmc, then I think we should keep it only for Renesas
> SDHI.

Alright, I re-spin the series taking into account what has been said.

Then I wait for your tested/reviewed-by tags before applying.

Kind regards
Uffe



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux