Hi Shimoda-san,
> + if (re - 1 - rs + 1 > tap_cnt) { // "if (re - rs > tap_cnt)" is more better?
Oops, looks really like an off-by-one error on my side :( Yes, I think
're - rs' is good here...
> + tap_end = re - 1;
... plain 'tap_end = re;' here ...
> + tap_start = rs;
> + tap_cnt = tap_end - tap_start + 1;
... and drop the '+ 1' here.
I will double check, and resend soon.
Thank you very much!
Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
