Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:20:59 +0100: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 08:40, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:51:27 -0700: > > > > > Convert the various uses of fallthrough comments to fallthrough; > > > > > > Done via script > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b56602fcf79f849e733e7b521bb0e17895d390fa.1582230379.git.joe.com/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c | 6 ++---- > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c | 4 ++-- > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c | 4 ++-- > > > sound/soc/codecs/jz4770.c | 2 +- > > > 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > I like very much the new way to advertise for fallthrough statements, > > but I am not willing to take any patch converting a single driver > > anymore. I had too many from Gustavo when these comments had to be > > inserted. I would really prefer a MTD-wide or a NAND-wide or at least a > > raw-NAND-wide single patch (anything inside drivers/mtd/nand/raw/). > > > > Hope you'll understand! > > I fully agree (for mmc). One patch please. > > Another option is to make a big fat tree wide patch and ask Linus if > he want to pick up immediately after an rc1. That should cause less > disturbance for everyone, no? Absolutely. Miquèl
