Thanks Matthias for review and suggestions.
On 2020-02-19 03:51, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Hi Pradeep,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 06:30:32PM +0530, Pradeep P V K wrote:
Add interconnect bandwidths for SDHC driver using OPP framework that
is required by SDHC driver based on the clock frequency and bus width
of the card. Otherwise, the system clocks may run at minimum clock
speed and thus affecting the performance.
This change is based on
[RFC] mmc: host: sdhci-msm: Use the interconnect API
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/11/499) and
[PATCH v6] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/6/740)
Co-developed-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
changes from RFC v3 -> v4:
- Addressed review comments from Bjorn and Matthias
This is not helpful, please describe in future versions what those
changes are.
sure will do this from next patch series.
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 204
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 200 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index 71f29ba..5af1c58 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -11,8 +11,10 @@
#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
#include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
@@ -229,6 +231,12 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info {
const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
};
+struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data {
+ struct icc_path *sdhc_to_ddr;
+ struct icc_path *cpu_to_sdhc;
+ u32 curr_freq;
+};
+
struct sdhci_msm_host {
struct platform_device *pdev;
void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */
@@ -255,8 +263,11 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
bool use_cdr;
u32 transfer_mode;
bool updated_ddr_cfg;
+ struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data *bus_vote_data;
};
+static void sdhci_msm_bus_voting(struct sdhci_host *host, bool
enable);
+
static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct
sdhci_host *host)
{
struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
@@ -1564,6 +1575,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct
sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(host, clock);
out:
+ sdhci_msm_bus_voting(host, !!clock);
__sdhci_msm_set_clock(host, clock);
}
@@ -1685,6 +1697,174 @@ static void
sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
pr_debug("%s: supported caps: 0x%08x\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), caps);
}
+/*
+ * Returns required bandwidth in Bytes per Sec
+ */
+static unsigned long sdhci_get_bw_required(struct sdhci_host *host,
+ struct mmc_ios *ios)
+{
+ struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+
+ switch (ios->bus_width) {
+ case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_1:
+ return msm_host->clk_rate/8;
nit: it would be more readable with spaces around '/'.
ok. i will address this in my next patchset.
+ case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4:
+ return msm_host->clk_rate/2;
+ case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8:
+ break;
+ }
+ return msm_host->clk_rate;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to parse the exact OPP node
+ * Returns OPP pointer on success else NULL on error
+ */
+static struct dev_pm_opp
+ *sdhci_msm_find_opp_for_freq(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
+ unsigned long bw)
+{
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+ struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(msm_host->mmc);
+ unsigned int freq = bw;
+ struct device *dev = &msm_host->pdev->dev;
+
+
+ if (!freq)
+ opp = dev_pm_opp_find_peak_bw_floor(dev, &freq);
+ else
+ opp = dev_pm_opp_find_peak_bw_exact(dev, freq, true);
+
+ /* Max bandwidth vote */
+ if (PTR_ERR(opp) == -ERANGE && freq > sdhci_msm_get_max_clock(host))
+ opp = dev_pm_opp_find_peak_bw_ceil(dev, &bw);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to find OPP for freq:%u err:%ld\n",
+ freq, PTR_ERR(opp));
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ return opp;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function sets the interconnect bus bandwidth
+ * vote based on bw (bandwidth) argument.
+ */
+#define BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS 2 /* 1. sdhc -> ddr 2. cpu -> sdhc */
+static void sdhci_msm_bus_set_vote(struct sdhci_host *host,
+ unsigned int bw)
+{
+ int i, ddr_rc, cpu_rc;
+ struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+ struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data *vote_data = msm_host->bus_vote_data;
+ struct device *dev = &msm_host->pdev->dev;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+ unsigned long freq = bw;
+ unsigned long peak_bw[BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS] = {0};
+ unsigned long avg_bw[BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS] = {0};
+
+ if (bw == vote_data->curr_freq)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS; i++) {
+ opp = sdhci_msm_find_opp_for_freq(msm_host, freq);
+ if (opp) {
+ avg_bw[i] = dev_pm_opp_get_bw(opp, &peak_bw[i]);
+ freq += 1; /* Next bandwidth vote */
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+ }
+ }
+ pr_debug("%s: freq:%d sdhc_to_ddr avg_bw:%lu peak_bw:%lu cpu_to_sdhc
avg_bw:%lu peak_bw:%lu\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc), bw, avg_bw[0], peak_bw[0],
+ avg_bw[1], peak_bw[1]);
+ ddr_rc = icc_set_bw(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr, 0, peak_bw[0]);
+ cpu_rc = icc_set_bw(vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc, 0, peak_bw[1]);
+ if (ddr_rc || cpu_rc) {
+ dev_err(dev, "icc_set() failed ddr_rc:%d cpu_rc:%d\n",
+ ddr_rc, cpu_rc);
+ return;
+ }
Do you necessarily want to set the bandwidth of the CPU to SDHC path,
if
setting the bandwidth for the SDHC to DDR path failed? If not I'd
suggest
to get rid of this double error handling with 'ddr_rc' and 'cpu_rc' and
handle each error individually.
It is not required to set bw for CPU to SDHC path, if setting to SDHC to
DDR path
failed. i will handle this individually in my next patch series.
+ vote_data->curr_freq = bw;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to register for OPP and interconnect
+ * frameworks.
+ */
+static struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data
+ *sdhci_msm_bus_register(struct sdhci_msm_host *host,
+ struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data *vote_data;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int ret;
+
+ vote_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vote_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!vote_data)
+ return NULL;
Even though the interconnects are optional I think we want to propagate
an
out of memory error, i.e. you probably want to return -ENOMEM here.
Also the allocated 'vote_data' will not be used if the ICC
configuration
does not exist or is invalid. I think Bjorn suggested to do the
allocation
after getting the ICC paths and error handling, when you know the
struct
is actually used.
ok i will do this in my next patch set.
+
+ vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr = of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, "sdhc-ddr");
+ vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc = of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, "cpu-sdhc");
+ if (!vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr || !vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ICC DT property is missing. skip vote !!\n");
+ return NULL;
This combined handling masks possible misconfigurations/errors, where
one
ICC path is specified (correctly or not), and the other not. Also the
log
message would be confusing in this case, since the ICC property exists.
Preferably NULL would only be returned if neither of the ICC paths is
specified. The message could be something like "no interconnect
configuration".
This is still not entirely correct, since there could be a
configuration, just
not with the expected interconnect names.
i will take care this in my next patch series.
+ } else if (IS_ERR(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr) ||
+ IS_ERR(vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "(%ld): failed getting %s path\n",
+ PTR_ERR(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr), "sdhc-ddr");
What is the point of using '%s' here?
Not required specifically. i will take care this too in my next patch
set.
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "(%ld): failed getting %s path\n",
+ PTR_ERR(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr), "cpu-sdhc");
ditto
ok.
+
+ return IS_ERR(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr) ?
+ ERR_CAST(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr) :
+ ERR_CAST(vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc);
+ }
The above could print an error message for an ICC path that doesn't
have a problem. Also we don't want to yell in case of deferred probing.
Something like this could be a possible alternative:
struct icc_path *icc_paths[BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS];
const char *path_names[] = {
"sdhc-ddr",
"cpu-sdhc"
};
// use loop?
icc_paths[0] = of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, "sdhc-ddr");
icc_paths[1] = of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, "cpu-sdhc");
if (!icc_paths[0] && !icc_paths[1]) {
dev_info(...);
return NULL;
}
for (i = 0; i < BUS_INTERCONNECT_PATHS; i++) {
int err = 0;
if (!icc_paths[i]) {
dev_err(pdev->dev. "interconnect path '%s' is not configured\n",
path_names[i]);
err = -EINVAL;
goto handle_err;
}
if (IS_ERR(icc_paths[i]) {
err = PTR_ERR(icc_paths[i]);
if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
dev_err(pdev->dev. "interconnect path '%s' is invalid: %d\n",
path_names[i], err);
}
handle_err:
if (err) {
int other = (i == 0)? 1 : 0;
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(icc_paths[other]))
icc_put(icc_paths[other]);
return err;
}
}
Thanks for the alternate code. i will address this in my next patch set.
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -ENODEV || ret == -ENODATA)
+ dev_err(dev, "OPP dt properties missing:%d\n", ret);
+ else
+ dev_err(dev, "OPP registration failed:%d\n", ret);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
Now that we know that there are no errors we can allocate 'vote_data'
and
initialize it.
ok.
+ return vote_data;
+}
+
+static void sdhci_msm_bus_unregister(struct device *dev,
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *host)
+{
+ struct sdhci_msm_bus_vote_data *vote_data = host->bus_vote_data;
+
+ if (!vote_data ||
+ IS_ERR(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr) ||
+ IS_ERR(vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc))
The check for errors in the ICC paths is not necessary. When an error
is
encountered sdhci_msm_bus_register() returns an error, not a struct.
ok. i will address this in my next patch set.
+ return;
+
+ icc_put(vote_data->sdhc_to_ddr);
+ icc_put(vote_data->cpu_to_sdhc);
+}
+
+static void sdhci_msm_bus_voting(struct sdhci_host *host, bool
enable)
+{
+ struct mmc_ios *ios = &host->mmc->ios;
+ struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+ unsigned int bw;
+
+ if (!msm_host->bus_vote_data ||
+ IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_vote_data))
no need to check for errors, _probe() is aborted in case of errors.
ok.
Thanks
Matthias
