On 2020-02-11 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Shaik Sajida Bhanu (2020-02-07 05:20:50)
The existing suspend/resume callbacks of sdhci-msm driver are just
gating/un-gating the clocks. During suspend cycle more can be done
like disabling controller, interrupts and card detection.
So updating the system pm callbacks for performing these extra
actions besides controlling the clocks.
Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Changes since V1:
Addressed review comments
Please don't write this. Instead, describe what's actually different so
the reader doesn't have to go figure out what the review comments were.
sure
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 50
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index c3a160c..e30c8a3 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -2159,9 +2159,55 @@ static __maybe_unused int
sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
+static int sdhci_msm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host =
sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE) {
+ ret = cqhci_suspend(host->mmc);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = sdhci_suspend_host(host);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ /* Disable pwr-irq since SDHC would be inactive */
+ disable_irq(msm_host->pwr_irq);
Why do we need to do this? If it's inactive then the irq won't be
raised
by the inactive hardware. Given that we're going to suspend the device,
the irq won't matter unless it's marked for wakeup. Please remove this
irq enable/disable logic, or explain why it's really needed.
You are right. This is not needed.
We have checked more on this and interrupt are getting disabled in
suspend_device_irqs().
Will remove this.
+
+ return pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
+}
+
