On 12/12/19 9:52 am, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> There is an official update for eSDHC tuning erratum A-008171.
> This patch is to implement the changes,
> - Affect all revisions of SoC.
> - Changes for tuning window checking.
> - Hardware hits a new condition that tuning succeeds although
> the eSDHC might not have tuned properly for type2 SoCs
> (soc_tuning_erratum_type2[] array in driver). So check
> tuning window after tuning succeeds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> index cd0f21e..a99c000d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> @@ -848,20 +848,20 @@ static int esdhc_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> }
>
> static struct soc_device_attribute soc_tuning_erratum_type1[] = {
> - { .family = "QorIQ T1023", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ T1040", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ T2080", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ LS1021A", .revision = "1.0", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ T1023", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ T1040", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ T2080", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LS1021A", },
> { },
> };
>
> static struct soc_device_attribute soc_tuning_erratum_type2[] = {
> - { .family = "QorIQ LS1012A", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ LS1043A", .revision = "1.*", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ LS1046A", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ LS1080A", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ LS2080A", .revision = "1.0", },
> - { .family = "QorIQ LA1575A", .revision = "1.0", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LS1012A", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LS1043A", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LS1046A", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LS1080A", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LS2080A", },
> + { .family = "QorIQ LA1575A", },
> { },
> };
>
> @@ -929,13 +929,13 @@ static void esdhc_prepare_sw_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 *window_start,
> /* Write 32'hFFFF_FFFF to IRQSTAT register */
> sdhci_writel(host, 0xFFFFFFFF, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
>
> - /* If TBSTAT[15:8]-TBSTAT[7:0] > 4 * div_ratio
> - * or TBSTAT[7:0]-TBSTAT[15:8] > 4 * div_ratio,
> + /* If TBSTAT[15:8]-TBSTAT[7:0] > (4 * div_ratio) + 2
> + * or TBSTAT[7:0]-TBSTAT[15:8] > (4 * div_ratio) + 2,
> * then program TBPTR[TB_WNDW_END_PTR] = 4 * div_ratio
> * and program TBPTR[TB_WNDW_START_PTR] = 8 * div_ratio.
> */
>
> - if (abs(start_ptr - end_ptr) > (4 * esdhc->div_ratio)) {
> + if (abs(start_ptr - end_ptr) > (4 * esdhc->div_ratio + 2)) {
> *window_start = 8 * esdhc->div_ratio;
> *window_end = 4 * esdhc->div_ratio;
> } else {
> @@ -1008,6 +1008,19 @@ static int esdhc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> if (ret)
> break;
>
> + /* For type2 affected platforms of the tuning erratum,
> + * tuning may succeed although eSDHC might not have
> + * tuned properly. Need to check tuning window.
> + */
> + if (esdhc->quirk_tuning_erratum_type2 &&
> + !host->tuning_err) {
> + esdhc_tuning_window_ptr(host, &window_start,
> + &window_end);
> + if (abs(window_start - window_end) >
> + (4 * esdhc->div_ratio + 2))
> + host->tuning_err = -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> /* If HW tuning fails and triggers erratum,
> * try workaround.
> */
>
