10.12.2019 15:52, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:40:11AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> All Tegra20 boards that have embedded Broadcom WiFi SDIO chip are affected
>> by a problem where WiFi chip reports CCCR v1.10, while it should v1.20.
>> In a result high-speed mode isn't enabled for the WiFi card and this
>> results in a malfunctioning SDIO communication.
>>
>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_readframes: read 304 bytes from channel 1 failed: -84
>> brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_rxfail: abort command, terminate frame, send NAK
>>
>> Downstream kernels are overriding card's CCCR info in SDHCI driver to fix
>> the problem, let's do the same in upstream.
>>
>> The change is inspired by omap_hsmmc_init_card() of OMAP's HSMMC driver,
>> which overrides card's info for the TI wl1251 WiFi.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> This seems like the wrong place to do this. If this is specific to this
> WiFi SDIO chip this should be handled at the SDIO card or function
> level. It seems like the SDIO infrastructure doesn't currently allow
> this because the OF nodes are attached to the card after
> mmc_sdio_init_card(), whereas it seems like the quirk is already needed
> during mmc_sdio_init_card().
>
> That said, I think we could have some common code that's executed as
> part of mmc_attach_sdio() (and before mmc_sdio_init_card()).
>
> Actually, it looks like we already have something like that.
> mmc_sdio_init_card() calls mmc_fixup_device() with sdio_fixup_methods
> after doing some very basic initialization. Do you know if things start
> to go wrong before or after that point? It might be worth looking at
> that SDIO fixup array and add something that would override the CCCR
> support. That would fix things in a more generic way rather than
> requiring every host controller driver to duplicate this quirk.
Hello Thierry,
Thank you very much for the suggestion, looks like indeed it is possible
to make workaround in a generic way.
Ulf / Adrian, will something like this be acceptable:
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/card.h b/drivers/mmc/core/card.h
index 7bd392d55cfa..a6001f210b9e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/card.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/card.h
@@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ static inline void __maybe_unused
add_limit_rate_quirk(struct mmc_card *card,
card->quirk_max_rate = data;
}
+static inline void __maybe_unused add_high_speed_quirk(struct mmc_card
*card,
+ int data)
+{
+ card->cccr.high_speed = data;
+}
+
/*
* Quirk add/remove for MMC products.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h b/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h
index 3dba15bccce2..a824c0caa7fb 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ static const struct mmc_fixup sdio_fixup_methods[] = {
SDIO_FIXUP(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_MARVELL_8887WLAN,
add_limit_rate_quirk, 150000000),
+ SDIO_FIXUP(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_BROADCOM_4329,
+ add_high_speed_quirk, 1),
+
END_FIXUP
};
[snip]
