On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:06 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> (...) > There is no need to keep my authorship of the patch, it's very much > different than the original. I would rather replace it that with a > suggested-by tag. OK > This is too early in the series. You need to deal with the DMA and pio > issues, before releasing this constraint. > > In other words, I would rather split this patch in two pieces. One > patch dealing with dma submit error path, placed first in the series > and another patch that adds the odd block sizes variant and releases > the constraint, which should comes last. > > Makes sense? Sure thing, I fix. We need to get the whole slew tested first then I'll collect the Tested-by's and reorder and split. Yours, Linus Walleij
