On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:51 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:29:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > These can be build completely independently, so split
> > the two Kconfig symbols.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> I'd mention the two symbols' names you're working on in the commit log.
> I guess it's about PLAT_SAMSUNG and ARCH_S5PV210. And I wouldn't call it
> "split" which IMHO suggests there was only one symbol before.
>
> Maybe:
>
> Don't imply PLAT_SAMSUNG if ARCH_S5PV210 is enabled
>
> would be a better subject line?
Ok, changed to
ARM: s5pv210: don't imply CONFIG_PLAT_SAMSUNG
> > @@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR) += spear
> > # by CONFIG_* macro name.
> > plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP) += omap
> > plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C64XX) += samsung
> > -plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210) += samsung
>
> Would it make more sense to make this
>
> plat-$(PLAT_SAMSUNG) += samsung
>
> (in a separate patch)? Hmm, it seems there is no plat-y for
> PLAT_S3C24XX=y builds. Is this intended? If yes, the directory name
> containing "samsung" suggests something that seems untrue.
By the end of the series, the plat-samsung directory is completely
removed (folded into mach-s3c), so that would only add more
churn for the same result I think.
Arnd
