On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 00:13, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:57 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Upfront in mmc_rescan() we use the host->rescan_entered flag, to allow > > scanning only once for non-removable cards. Therefore, it's also not > > possible that we can have bus attached, when we are scanning non-removable > > cards. For this reason, let' drop the check for mmc_card_is_removable() as > > it's redundant. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 7 ++----- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > index 221127324709..6f8342702c73 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > @@ -2297,11 +2297,8 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work) > > > > mmc_bus_get(host); > > > > - /* > > - * if there is a _removable_ card registered, check whether it is > > - * still present > > - */ > > - if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead && mmc_card_is_removable(host)) > > + /* Verify a registered card to be functional, else remove it. */ > > + if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead) > > host->bus_ops->detect(host); > > At first I thought this was a bit more of a change than your > description makes it sound like. Specifically it seemed like > non-removable cards used to never call host->bus_ops->detect() here > (even during the first call to mmc_rescan) but now they would call it > the first time through. > > ...so I put in a bunch of printouts. It appears that the first time > through mmc_rescan() host->bus_ops is NULL. > > ...ah, and this is what that sentence in your description means about > having a bus attached. Now I get it! :-) > > ...so, right, this looks fine. > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for testing and reviewing! Let me amend the changelog a bit, to try to clarify that the host->bus_ops is NULL. Additionally, I think this one should be tagged for stable, but let's see what happens with patch 2/2 first. Kind regards Uffe
