Re: [PATCH 0/3] brcmfmac: sdio: Deal better w/ transmission errors waking from sleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/18/2019 12:54 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
This series attempts to deal better with the expected transmission
errors that we get when waking up the SDIO-based WiFi on
rk3288-veyron-minnie, rk3288-veyron-speedy, and rk3288-veyron-mickey.

Some details about those errors can be found in
<https://crbug.com/960222>, but to summarize it here: if we try to
send the wakeup command to the WiFi card at the same time it has
decided to wake up itself then it will behave badly on the SDIO bus.
This can cause timeouts or CRC errors.

When I tested on 4.19 and 4.20 these CRC errors can be seen to cause
re-tuning.  Since I am currently developing on 4.19 this was the
original problem I attempted to solve.

On mainline it turns out that you don't see the retuning errors but
you see tons of spam about timeouts trying to wakeup from sleep.  I
tracked down the commit that was causing that and have partially
reverted it here.  I have no real knowledge about Broadcom WiFi, but
the commit that was causing problems sounds (from the descriptioin) to
be a hack commit penalizing all Broadcom WiFi users because of a bug
in a Cypress SD controller.  I will let others comment if this is
truly the case and, if so, what the right solution should be.

Let me give a bit of background. The brcmfmac driver implements its own runtime-pm like functionality, ie. if the driver is idle for some time it will put the device in a low-power state. When it does that it powers down several cores in the chip among which the SDIO core. However, the SDIO bus used be very bad at handling devices that do that so instead it has the Always-On-Station (AOS) block take over the SDIO core in handling the bus. Default is will send a R1 response, but only for CMD52 (and CMD14 but no host is using that cruft). In noCmdDecode it does not respond and simply wakes up the SDIO core, which takes over again. Because it does not respond timeouts (-110) are kinda expected in this mode.

Regards,
Arend



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux