Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-omap: Don't finish_mrq() on a command error during tuning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/03/19 10:38 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> commit 5b0d62108b46 ("mmc: sdhci-omap: Add platform specific reset
> callback") skips data resets during tuning operation. Because of this,
> a data error or data finish interrupt might still arrive after a command
> error has been handled and the mrq ended. This ends up with a "mmc0: Got
> data interrupt 0x00000002 even though no data operation was in progress"
> error message.
> 
> Fix this by adding a platform specific callback for command errors. Mark
> the mrq as a failure but wait for a data interrupt instead of calling
> finish_mrq().
> 
> Fixes: 5b0d62108b46 ("mmc: sdhci-omap: Add platform specific reset
> callback")
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
> index b1a66ca3821a..67b361a403bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
> @@ -797,6 +797,29 @@ void sdhci_omap_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
>  	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
>  }
>  
> +void sdhci_omap_cmd_err(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask, u32 *intmask_p)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_omap_host *omap_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +
> +	if (omap_host->is_tuning) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Since we are not resetting data lines during tuning
> +		 * operation, data error or data complete interrupts
> +		 * might still arrive. Mark this request as a failure
> +		 * but still wait for the data interrupt
> +		 */
> +		if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_TIMEOUT)
> +			host->cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		else
> +			host->cmd->error = -EILSEQ;
> +
> +		sdhci_finish_command(host);
> +	} else {
> +		sdhci_cmd_err(host, intmask, intmask_p);
> +	}
> +}

Could this be done by the existing ->irq() callback? i.e. mask the error
bits in intmask (have to write them back to SDHCI_INT_STATUS also) but set
cmd->error.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux