Hi
On 1/7/2019 6:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 7/01/19 1:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
>>> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
>>> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
>>> specified directly. This driver relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends
>>> on PCI. For this reason, add a direct dependency to CONFIG_PCI here.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>>> index e26b8145efb3..1b9401fe94c0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>>> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ config MMC_RICOH_MMC
>>>
>>> config MMC_SDHCI_ACPI
>>> tristate "SDHCI support for ACPI enumerated SDHCI controllers"
>>> - depends on MMC_SDHCI && ACPI
>>> + depends on MMC_SDHCI && ACPI && PCI
>>> select IOSF_MBI if X86
>>> help
>>> This selects support for ACPI enumerated SDHCI controllers,
>>> --
>>
>> Any objections against this one from anyone?
>
> + QCOM and AMD contributors
>
No issues with us as we have separate PCI based driver and ACPI based driver.
Regards
Nehal Shah
