On 5 October 2018 at 12:09, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:"
> comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is
> expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c
> index 2cfec33..abe253c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void meson_mx_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> switch (ios->power_mode) {
> case MMC_POWER_OFF:
> vdd = 0;
> - /* fall-through: */
> + /* fall through */
> case MMC_POWER_UP:
> if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) {
> host->error = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
