Hi Geert,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add r8a77470 support
>
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:22 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Perhaps stating the obvious: this feels a lot like the problem we thought
> > > > we had with different Gen-3 SoCs/ES versions. And in that case we decided
> > > > against using compat strings to differentiate. The main difference here
> > > > seems to be that we need to differentiate between different ports on the
> > > > same SoC.
> >
> > Yes, I agree. Our so far agreed solution didn't take into account that
> > there are different SDHI versions on the same SoC. Adding a compatible
> > might be the easiest solution, but then we have a mix of compatibles,
> > soc_device_match, and even version register (deeper in the driver). My
> > gut feeling is we should take the time to rethink all this?
> >
> > > So either
> > > a) SDHI0/2 vs. SDHI1 are different, deserving different compatible values, or
> > > b) SDHI0/1/2 are identical, but SDHI1 is wired different, deserving the same
> > > compatible value, but one or more additional properties describing the
> > > different wiring.
> >
> > Actually, SDHI2 seems different, too. It doesn't support SDR104. I don't
> > have the SDHI specific docs, but from the main docs, all SDHI instances
> > are different.
>
> I forgot about the version register.
>
> Fabrizio: can you please check what the 3 instances report in their version
> registers? Thanks!
SDHI0: 0xcc0d
SDHI1: 0xcc10
SDHI2: 0xcc0d
Cheers,
Fab
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.
