On 09/20/2018 07:56 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 18 September 2018 at 12:55, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre@xxxxxx> wrote:
From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
This patch internalizes the dma_inprogress into mmci dma interfaces.
This allows to simplify and prepare the next dma callbacks
for mmci host ops. __dma_inprogress is called in mmci_dma_data_error
and mmci_dma_finalize.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 16 ++++++++++------
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h | 4 +---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
index bf0bb07..7d22cb9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
@@ -497,6 +497,9 @@ static void mmci_dma_unmap(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
static void mmci_dma_data_error(struct mmci_host *host)
{
+ if (!__dma_inprogress(host))
+ return;
+
dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "error during DMA transfer!\n");
dmaengine_terminate_all(host->dma_current);
host->dma_in_progress = false;
@@ -512,6 +515,9 @@ static void mmci_dma_finalize(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
u32 status;
int i;
+ if (!__dma_inprogress(dmae))
+ return;
+
/* Wait up to 1ms for the DMA to complete */
for (i = 0; ; i++) {
status = readl(host->base + MMCISTATUS);
@@ -903,8 +909,7 @@ mmci_data_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
u32 remain, success;
/* Terminate the DMA transfer */
- if (dma_inprogress(host))
- mmci_dma_data_error(host);
+ mmci_dma_data_error(host);
/*
* Calculate how far we are into the transfer. Note that
@@ -942,8 +947,8 @@ mmci_data_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "stray MCI_DATABLOCKEND interrupt\n");
if (status & MCI_DATAEND || data->error) {
- if (dma_inprogress(host))
- mmci_dma_finalize(host, data);
+ mmci_dma_finalize(host, data);
+
mmci_stop_data(host);
if (!data->error)
@@ -1050,8 +1055,7 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
if ((!sbc && !cmd->data) || cmd->error) {
if (host->data) {
/* Terminate the DMA transfer */
- if (dma_inprogress(host))
- mmci_dma_data_error(host);
+ mmci_dma_data_error(host);
mmci_stop_data(host);
}
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
index 696a066..f1ec066 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
@@ -332,9 +332,7 @@ struct mmci_host {
struct mmci_host_next next_data;
bool dma_in_progress;
-#define dma_inprogress(host) ((host)->dma_in_progress)
-#else
-#define dma_inprogress(host) (0)
+#define __dma_inprogress(host) ((host)->dma_in_progress)
Overall the change makes good sense to me, however I don't get why you
want to rename the macro-function. Please don't.
Oops it's a mistake, I forgot this patch (I remove this) .
I wait the end of review and will resend.
like you proposed in previous review this macros is renamed with
mmci_dmae_inprogress (in patch 04/14) to has common prefix with
structure mmci_dmae_priv, mmci_dmae_next...
#endif
};
--
2.7.4
Kind regards
Uffe
