Re: SDHCI Regression with 6ce3dd6eec11 ("blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/21/2018 04:03 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 21/08/18 15:37, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Hi

I bisected some kind of SDHCI regression to commit 6ce3dd6eec11 ("blk-mq:
issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'") causing dumps
below and one or more systemd-udevd processes being in uninterruptible sleep
state preventing safe reboot/shutdown.

This is from an Intel Baytrail based tablet with integrated eMMC but my
up-to-date Debian/testing rootfs (with systemd) is on USB stick.

It doesn't revert cleanly on today's head 778a33959a8a but issue is gone if
I go to a commit before 6ce3dd6eec11 and occurs at 6ce3dd6eec11.

This was discussed here:

	https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=153334717506073&w=2

Coincidentally, I just sent the fix patch:

	https://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=153485326025301&w=2

Cool, it fixed my regression. I tested both on top of 6ce3dd6eec11 and head 778a33959a8a. Maybe you would like to add into your patch another fixes tag and my tested by:

Fixes: 6ce3dd6eec11 ("blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'")
Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux