> > Should come after Yamada-san's patches, I'd think. > > What are these? A more complex series adding another SDHI user. > > BTW Sergei, did you test with SDIO devices? > > No. But I really think the current code is borked. If you don't have an interrupt > to handle, you should idicate that. I think the patch is justified, I am not talking about that. I just wondered if you tested it. So, you are not missing something in the SDIO code path which you changed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
