On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:25:16 +0300
Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24.07.2018 17:34, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
> > Run the automatic pad calibration after voltage switching if
> > tegra_host->pad_calib_required is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
> > index 78781bd..529aa4e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c
> > @@ -537,6 +537,8 @@ static int sdhci_tegra_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> > struct mmc_ios *ios)
> > {
> > struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > + struct sdhci_tegra *tegra_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330) {
> > @@ -551,6 +553,9 @@ static int sdhci_tegra_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> > ret = tegra_sdhci_set_padctrl(host, ios->signal_voltage);
> > }
> >
> > + if (tegra_host->pad_calib_required)
> > + tegra_sdhci_pad_autocalib(host);
>
> What if the autocalibration fails? Should we return an error?
I would assume that aborting the signal voltage switch due to a
calibration timeout would not be necessary as the TRM specifies drive
strength values which are to be programmed in case a timeout occurs.
However, I don't know what are the exact implications of running the bus
with the timeout values instead of the calibrated ones. The TRM does not
comment on that. I guess tuning would fail and catch the error that way
in case the timeout default values aren't sufficient.
-Aapo
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
