On 11 July 2018 at 14:29, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/07/18 14:39, Stefan Agner wrote: >> In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency >> is set to 0. However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency >> change while clocks are on. In that case the function clears the >> divider registers (by clearing ESDHC_CLOCK_MASK) while the clock is >> enabled! This causes a short period of time where the clock is >> undivided (on a i.MX 6DL a clock of 196MHz has been measured). >> >> For older IP variants the driver disables clock by clearing some bits >> in ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL. >> >> Make sure to disable card clock before chainging frequency for uSDHC > > chainging -> changing > >> IP variants too. Also fix indent to make disable/enable clock look >> alike. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 14 +++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c >> index 85fd5a8b0b6d..aa48f4b2541a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c >> @@ -708,14 +708,14 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, >> int div = 1; >> u32 temp, val; >> >> + if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) { >> + val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); >> + writel(val & ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON, >> + host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); >> + } >> + >> if (clock == 0) { >> host->mmc->actual_clock = 0; >> - >> - if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) { >> - val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); >> - writel(val & ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON, >> - host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); >> - } >> return; >> } >> >> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static inline void esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, >> if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) { >> val = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); >> writel(val | ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_FRC_SDCLK_ON, >> - host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); >> + host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); > > Ideally each patch does only 1 thing. Please make white-space fix-up a > separate patch. > >> } >> >> mdelay(1); >> > It turned out that I had already applied this one. I am going to re-base my next branch next week, so dropping the patch by then. Until then, the patch is reverted. Stefan, please send a new version addressing Adrian's comments. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html