+Cc: Jean On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 25 May 2018 at 23:07, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> The newly added runtime-pm functions cause a harmless warning >>> when CONFIG_PM is disabled: >>> >>> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c:1452:12: error: 'sunxi_mmc_runtime_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] >>> static int sunxi_mmc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c:1435:12: error: 'sunxi_mmc_runtime_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] >>> static int sunxi_mmc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>> >>> This marks them as __maybe_unused to shut up the warning. >> >> Most mmc drivers uses #ifdef CONFIG_PM instead of the __maybe_unused() option. >> >> It's not a big deal, but consistency is always good. Would you mind changing? > > I'd prefer not to. Most uses of #ifdef CONFIG_PM that get introduced are wrong, > and cause additional randconfig warnings that I end up having to fix, > so I always > do it with __maybe_unused. Some of the maintainers have strong objection against such changes. http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1805.1/06100.html It seems we might have a split in the opinions, which is not good in this case (consistency for PM callbacks overall will be broken). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
