On 2018-05-03 04:07, Asutosh Das wrote:
From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
As multiple requests are submitted to the ufs host controller in
parallel there could be instances where the command completion
interrupt arrives later for a request that is already processed
earlier as the corresponding doorbell was cleared when handling
the previous interrupt. Read the interrupt status in a loop after
processing the received interrupt to catch such interrupts and
handle it.
Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index c35a076..09b7a3f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -5383,19 +5383,30 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void
*__hba)
u32 intr_status, enabled_intr_status;
irqreturn_t retval = IRQ_NONE;
struct ufs_hba *hba = __hba;
+ int retries = hba->nutrs;
spin_lock(hba->host->host_lock);
intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
- enabled_intr_status =
- intr_status & ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
- if (intr_status)
- ufshcd_writel(hba, intr_status, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+ /*
+ * There could be max of hba->nutrs reqs in flight and in worst case
+ * if the reqs get finished 1 by 1 after the interrupt status is
+ * read, make sure we handle them by checking the interrupt status
+ * again in a loop until we process all of the reqs before returning.
+ */
+ do {
+ enabled_intr_status =
+ intr_status & ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
+ if (intr_status)
+ ufshcd_writel(hba, intr_status, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+ if (enabled_intr_status) {
+ ufshcd_sl_intr(hba, enabled_intr_status);
+ retval = IRQ_HANDLED;
+ }
+
+ intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+ } while (intr_status && --retries);
- if (enabled_intr_status) {
- ufshcd_sl_intr(hba, enabled_intr_status);
- retval = IRQ_HANDLED;
- }
spin_unlock(hba->host->host_lock);
return retval;
}
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
