On 07/03/18 15:20, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> sdhci has a 10 second timeout to catch devices that stop responding.
> Instead of programming 10 second arbitrary value, calculate the total time
> it would take for the entire transfer to happen and program the timeout
> value accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 1dd117cbeb6e..baab67bfa39b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -709,6 +709,36 @@ static u32 sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
> return sg_dma_address(host->data->sg);
> }
>
> +static void sdhci_calc_sw_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host,
> + struct mmc_command *cmd,
> + unsigned int target_timeout)
> +{
> + struct mmc_data *data = cmd->data;
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> + u64 transfer_time;
> + struct mmc_ios *ios = &mmc->ios;
> + unsigned char bus_width = 1 << ios->bus_width;
> + unsigned int blksz;
> + unsigned int freq;
> +
> + if (data) {
> + blksz = data->blksz;
> + freq = host->mmc->actual_clock ? : host->clock;
> + transfer_time = (u64)blksz * NSEC_PER_SEC * (8 / bus_width);
> + do_div(transfer_time, freq);
> + /* multiply by '2' to account for any unknowns */
> + transfer_time = transfer_time * 2;
> + /* calculate timeout for the entire data */
> + host->data_timeout = (data->blocks * ((target_timeout *
> + NSEC_PER_USEC) +
> + transfer_time));
(target_timeout * NSEC_PER_USEC) might be 32-bit and therefore overflow
for timeouts greater than about 4 seconds.
> + } else {
> + host->data_timeout = (u64)target_timeout * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> + }
> +
> + host->data_timeout += MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_TIME;
Need to allow for target_timeout == 0 so:
if (host->data_timeout)
host->data_timeout += MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_TIME;
> +}
> +
> static u8 sdhci_calc_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> {
> u8 count;
> @@ -766,6 +796,7 @@ static u8 sdhci_calc_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> if (count >= 0xF)
> break;
> }
> + sdhci_calc_sw_timeout(host, cmd, target_timeout);
If you make the changes I suggest for patch 6, then this would
move sdhci_calc_sw_timeout() into sdhci_set_timeout().
I suggest you factor out the target_timeout calculation e.g.
static unsigned int sdhci_target_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host,
struct mmc_command *cmd,
struct mmc_data *data)
{
unsigned int target_timeout;
/* timeout in us */
if (!data)
target_timeout = cmd->busy_timeout * 1000;
else {
target_timeout = DIV_ROUND_UP(data->timeout_ns, 1000);
if (host->clock && data->timeout_clks) {
unsigned long long val;
/*
* data->timeout_clks is in units of clock cycles.
* host->clock is in Hz. target_timeout is in us.
* Hence, us = 1000000 * cycles / Hz. Round up.
*/
val = 1000000ULL * data->timeout_clks;
if (do_div(val, host->clock))
target_timeout++;
target_timeout += val;
}
}
return target_timeout;
}
And call it from sdhci_calc_sw_timeout()
>
> return count;
> }
> @@ -1175,13 +1206,6 @@ void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> mdelay(1);
> }
>
> - timeout = jiffies;
> - if (!cmd->data && cmd->busy_timeout > 9000)
> - timeout += DIV_ROUND_UP(cmd->busy_timeout, 1000) * HZ + HZ;
> - else
> - timeout += 10 * HZ;
> - sdhci_mod_timer(host, cmd->mrq, timeout);
> -
> host->cmd = cmd;
> if (sdhci_data_line_cmd(cmd)) {
> WARN_ON(host->data_cmd);
> @@ -1221,6 +1245,15 @@ void sdhci_send_command(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> cmd->opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200)
> flags |= SDHCI_CMD_DATA;
>
> + timeout = jiffies;
> + if (host->data_timeout > 0) {
This can be just:
if (host->data_timeout) {
> + timeout += nsecs_to_jiffies(host->data_timeout);
> + host->data_timeout = 0;
It would be better to initialize host->data_timeout = 0 at the top of
sdhci_prepare_data().
Also still need:
else if (!cmd->data && cmd->busy_timeout > 9000) {
timeout += DIV_ROUND_UP(cmd->busy_timeout, 1000) * HZ + HZ;
> + } else {
> + timeout += 10 * HZ;
> + }
> + sdhci_mod_timer(host, cmd->mrq, timeout);
> +
> sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_CMD(cmd->opcode, flags), SDHCI_COMMAND);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_send_command);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index ff283ee08854..29b242fd17de 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,14 @@ struct sdhci_adma2_64_desc {
> /* Allow for a a command request and a data request at the same time */
> #define SDHCI_MAX_MRQS 2
>
> +/*
> + * 48bit command and 136 bit response in 100KHz clock could take upto 2.48ms.
> + * However since the start time of the command, the time between
> + * command and response, and the time between response and start of data is
> + * not known, set the command transfer time to 10ms.
> + */
> +#define MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_TIME (10 * NSEC_PER_MSEC) /* max 10 ms */
> +
> enum sdhci_cookie {
> COOKIE_UNMAPPED,
> COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED, /* mapped by sdhci_pre_req() */
> @@ -555,6 +563,8 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> /* Host SDMA buffer boundary. */
> u32 sdma_boundary;
>
> + u64 data_timeout;
> +
> unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
> };
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
