2018-03-06 5:48 GMT+09:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Commit "mmc: renesas_sdhi: use MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT instead of
> TMIO own flag" activated MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT for Renesas SDHI
> which incorrectly disabled WP altogether instead of only disabling the
> internal mechanism.
I am not opposed to this patch,
but I have a question.
Is this is a real problem in the upstream kernel?
(If so, how do renesas boards set-up WP GPIOs?)
When I wrote the addressed patch,
I checked all renesas drivers and device trees,
and confirmed no one set WP-GPIOs.
Then, I described the following in my commit log:
Only the difference is the TMIO_... makes tmio_mmc_get_ro() return 0
(i.e. it does not affect mmc_gpio_get_ro() at all), while MMC_CAP2_...
returns 0 before calling ->get_ro() hook (i.e. it affects both IP own
logic and GPIO detection).
The TMIO MMC drivers do not set-up gpio_ro by themselves. Only the
possibility, if any, would be DT specifies "wp-gpios" property, and
gpio_ro is set by mmc_gpiod_request_ro() called from mmc_of_parse().
However, it does not make sense to specify "wp-gpios" property and
TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE at the same time.
I checked under arch/arm/boot/dts/ and arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/,
and I did not see any Renesas boards with "wp-gpios". So, this
conversion should be safe.
> Since the whole WP handling has been reworked, we
> can simply disable this capability to re-enable WP GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> More testing revealed this. This time, I don't think squashing makes sense but
> I am open to discussion here.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
