Hi On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3 January 2018 at 17:38, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 21 December 2017 at 14:22, Michael Trimarchi >>> <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> mmc clock can be stopped during runtime suspend and restart during runtime >>>> resume. This let us know to not have any clock running and this reduce >>>> the EMI of the device when the bus is not in use >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 5 +++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c >>>> index 7123ef9..9a5e96f 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c >>>> @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data { >>>> struct clk *clk_ipg; >>>> struct clk *clk_ahb; >>>> struct clk *clk_per; >>>> + unsigned int actual_clock; >>>> enum { >>>> NO_CMD_PENDING, /* no multiblock command pending*/ >>>> MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS, /* exact multiblock cmd in process */ >>>> @@ -1346,6 +1347,9 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>> >>>> ret = sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(host); >>>> >>>> + imx_data->actual_clock = host->mmc->actual_clock; >>>> + esdhc_pltfm_set_clock(host, 0); >>> >>> I guess want the clock to stay on "if sdhci_sdio_irq_enabled(host)". >>> So you should probably move the above inside the below if statement. >>> >> >> Well I'm not quite sure about it. Some wifi chipset has the wakeup >> interrupt on external gpio >> and someone wakeup from DAT1. Why clock should be required? > > The clock should not be needed when using external GPIO (also > described as an out-band IRQ/wakeup), but from DAT1. > Ok, I will re-post new patches > When sdhci_sdio_irq_enabled() returns true, that *should* indicate > that DAT1 is used. Although, there may be reasons to re-visit this > later, because the hole SDIO irq thing around wakeups for sdhci, is > being reworked by Adrian [1]. I will take a look on this post Regards Michael > >> >> Anyway I should even rebalance resume. > > Yes. > > [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe > > [1] > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg47512.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html