On 19 November 2017 at 05:52, Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> platform_get_irq() can fail here and we must check its return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied for next!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> changes in v2 :
> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
> changes in v3 :
> return -EINVAL instead of host->irq.
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index cc98355d..c926ac8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -1255,6 +1255,11 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_resource_request(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
> goto error_assert_reset;
>
> host->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (host->irq <= 0) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto error_assert_reset;
> + }
> +
> return devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, host->irq, sunxi_mmc_irq,
> sunxi_mmc_handle_manual_stop, 0, "sunxi-mmc", host);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
