Re: Possible regression due to "arm64: renesas: salvator: set driver type for eMMC"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While I think it could be that the early ES1.0 boards might have different eMMC
> chips...

FTR, my boards have:

Salvator-X with H3 ES1.0:
    mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
    mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 BGSD3R 29.1 GiB

Salvator-X with M3-W ES1.0:

    mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
    mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 eMMC   28.8 GiB

Salvator-XS with H3 ES2.0:

    mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
    mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 BGSD3R 29.1 GiB

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux