Hi Wolfram, 2017-11-20 22:22 GMT+09:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Last week I was working on the TMIO driver >> and I have more bug-fix and clean-up patches in hand now. >> (about 20 patches) >> >> The patch order is getting a mess, >> so I am planning to put all patches in one series. >> >> If not in hurry, can you wait for a little? > > So, did I get this correct: all your current patches are obsolete > meanwhile? And I don't need to test or tag them until your new series > comes out? > No, that is not what I meant. I a bit felt sorry to ask you to test my patches several times. I thought I could ask you to test for a larger chunk (since 4.16 is far away anyway), but if you do not mind it, please go a head for testing the current patches. I fixed some typos, but no change in the code diff. Once you test them and issue Reviewed-by, you do not need to re-review them. Please let me postpone only the following one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10045861/ I had two ideas in my mind [1] move mmc_of_parse() to each driver's probe [2] move mmc_of_parse() to tmio_mmc_host_alloc() After I thought a bit, perhaps [2] might be cleaner... Thanks! -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
