On 09/11/17 15:36, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 3 November 2017 at 14:20, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> card_busy_detect() doesn't set a correct timeout, and it doesn't take care
>> of error status bits. Stop using it for blk-mq.
>
> I think this changelog isn't very descriptive. Could you please work
> on that for the next version.
Ok
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>> index 0c29b1d8d545..5c5ff3c34313 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>> @@ -1426,15 +1426,18 @@ static inline void mmc_apply_rel_rw(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -#define CMD_ERRORS \
>> - (R1_OUT_OF_RANGE | /* Command argument out of range */ \
>> - R1_ADDRESS_ERROR | /* Misaligned address */ \
>> +#define CMD_ERRORS_EXCL_OOR \
>> + (R1_ADDRESS_ERROR | /* Misaligned address */ \
>> R1_BLOCK_LEN_ERROR | /* Transferred block length incorrect */\
>> R1_WP_VIOLATION | /* Tried to write to protected block */ \
>> R1_CARD_ECC_FAILED | /* Card ECC failed */ \
>> R1_CC_ERROR | /* Card controller error */ \
>> R1_ERROR) /* General/unknown error */
>>
>> +#define CMD_ERRORS \
>> + (CMD_ERRORS_EXCL_OOR | \
>> + R1_OUT_OF_RANGE) /* Command argument out of range */ \
>> +
>> static void mmc_blk_eval_resp_error(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
>> {
>> u32 val;
>> @@ -1951,6 +1954,95 @@ static void mmc_blk_ss_read(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>> mqrq->retries = MMC_NO_RETRIES;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool mmc_blk_oor_valid(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
>> +{
>> + return !!brq->mrq.sbc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline u32 mmc_blk_stop_err_bits(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
>> +{
>> + return mmc_blk_oor_valid(brq) ? CMD_ERRORS : CMD_ERRORS_EXCL_OOR;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool mmc_blk_in_tran_state(u32 status)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Some cards mishandle the status bits, so make sure to check both the
>> + * busy indication and the card state.
>> + */
>> + return status & R1_READY_FOR_DATA &&
>> + (R1_CURRENT_STATE(status) == R1_STATE_TRAN);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int mmc_blk_clock_khz(struct mmc_host *host)
>> +{
>> + if (host->actual_clock)
>> + return host->actual_clock / 1000;
>> +
>> + /* Clock may be subject to a divisor, fudge it by a factor of 2. */
>> + if (host->ios.clock)
>> + return host->ios.clock / 2000;
>> +
>> + /* How can there be no clock */
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> + return 100; /* 100 kHz is minimum possible value */
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned long mmc_blk_data_timeout_jiffies(struct mmc_host *host,
>> + struct mmc_data *data)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(data->timeout_ns, 1000000);
>> + unsigned int khz;
>> +
>> + if (data->timeout_clks) {
>> + khz = mmc_blk_clock_khz(host);
>> + ms += DIV_ROUND_UP(data->timeout_clks, khz);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return msecs_to_jiffies(ms);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int mmc_blk_card_stuck(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req,
>> + u32 *resp_errs)
>> +{
>> + struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_req(req);
>> + struct mmc_data *data = &mqrq->brq.data;
>> + unsigned long timeout;
>> + u32 status;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + timeout = jiffies + mmc_blk_data_timeout_jiffies(card->host, data);
>> +
>> + while (1) {
>> + bool done = time_after(jiffies, timeout);
>> +
>> + err = __mmc_send_status(card, &status, 5);
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("%s: error %d requesting status\n",
>> + req->rq_disk->disk_name, err);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Accumulate any response error bits seen */
>> + if (resp_errs)
>> + *resp_errs |= status;
>> +
>> + if (mmc_blk_in_tran_state(status))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + /* Timeout if the device never becomes ready */
>> + if (done) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Card stuck in wrong state! %s %s\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(card->host),
>> + req->rq_disk->disk_name, __func__);
>> + err = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> The new function here, mmc_blk_card_stuck() looks very similar to
> card_busy_detect().
>
> Why can't you instead fixup card_busy_detect() so it behaves like the
> new mmc_blk_card_stuck(), rather than re-implementing most of it?
I saw an advantage in keeping the legacy code separate so that it didn't
then also need testing.
I guess it doesn't hurt to try to fix up the old code.
>
>> +
>> static void mmc_blk_rw_recovery(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>> {
>> int type = rq_data_dir(req) == READ ? MMC_BLK_READ : MMC_BLK_WRITE;
>> @@ -2097,17 +2189,26 @@ static inline bool mmc_blk_rq_error(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
>> static int mmc_blk_card_busy(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req)
>> {
>> struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_req(req);
>> - bool gen_err = false;
>> + u32 status = 0;
>> int err;
>>
>> if (mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) || rq_data_dir(req) == READ)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - err = card_busy_detect(card, MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS, false, req, &gen_err);
>> + err = mmc_blk_card_stuck(card, req, &status);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Do not assume data transferred correctly if there are any error bits
>> + * set.
>> + */
>> + if (!err && status & mmc_blk_stop_err_bits(&mqrq->brq)) {
>> + mqrq->brq.data.bytes_xfered = 0;
>> + err = -EIO;
>> + }
>>
>> - /* Copy the general error bit so it will be seen later on */
>> - if (gen_err)
>> - mqrq->brq.stop.resp[0] |= R1_ERROR;
>> + /* Copy the exception bit so it will be seen later on */
>> + if (mmc_card_mmc(card) && status & R1_EXCEPTION_EVENT)
>> + mqrq->brq.cmd.resp[0] |= R1_EXCEPTION_EVENT;
>>
>> return err;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
