It is not efficient to call gpiod_to_irq() regardless the flag, then ignore the returned irq if MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL. Move gpiod_to_irq() after the MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL check. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c index 863f1db..f7c6e05 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c @@ -121,20 +121,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_gpio_request_ro); void mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(struct mmc_host *host) { struct mmc_gpio *ctx = host->slot.handler_priv; - int ret, irq; + int irq = -EINVAL; + int ret; if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0 || !ctx || !ctx->cd_gpio) return; - irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio); - /* - * Even if gpiod_to_irq() returns a valid IRQ number, the platform might - * still prefer to poll, e.g., because that IRQ number is already used - * by another unit and cannot be shared. + * Do not use IRQ if the platform prefers to poll, e.g., because that + * IRQ number is already used by another unit and cannot be shared. */ - if (irq >= 0 && host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL) - irq = -EINVAL; + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)) + irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio); if (irq >= 0) { if (!ctx->cd_gpio_isr) -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html