Hi, On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > ... >> Yes, it looks hard to get concurrency right. I have a comment for your >> DRTO case(patch 5). Let's do some brainstorm there. > > Since your comments in this patch are positive and you've now added > your Reviewed-by to patch #5, I'm going to assume that you'd also like > your Reviewed-by on this patch? > > > Jaehoon: I think I have Shawn's review on all this series. It would > be great if you could review them yourself and/or pick them up in your > tree. Since they fix a regression on 4.14 we really don't want to > delay too long. If you're busy, please yell and we can figure out a > way to get these in (either through Ulf directly or we should find > someone else to make a git tree and send a pull request). Ulf: I still haven't heard anything for Jaehoon. Do you have any interest in landing this series directly to your tree? I think the whole series has been reviewed by Shawn. I'm happy to re-post with collected tags or anything else you'd like. It would be nice to get the regression fixed sooner rather than later... Thanks! :) -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
