On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 21:49 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > > The result of the tuning does not depends on starting point, so I don't > > really > > understand how it would significantly change things. > > > > I think it depends on the tx phase starting point. > If the result of the tuning is not independent of the starting, instead of just telling me, it is fairly easy for you to give actual result, like I asked you: > > Ok, starting from Rx:0 Tx:270 then tuning gives you Tx:300 Rx:90 > > And what different did it gives you starting Rx:0/Tx:0 ? And if the result are indeed vastly different, let's debug and get a real explanation. > Tuning does: > rx phase tuning > tx phase tuning > rx phase tuning > > Result of each step depends on result of previous step. Again, we don't agree. > So also the initial > rx phase tuning result depends on the starting point of tx phase. The first Rx tuning is there only to get a sane starting point for the tx tuning ,as explained in the code. This is the reason why is not done when re-tuning. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
