Hello,
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:13:00 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> - clock-names:
> >> Array of names corresponding to clocks property.
> >> The input clock for Xenon IP core should be named as "core".
> >> + The input clock for the AXI bus must be named as "axi".
> >
> > Is "bus" more suitable?
>
> I find bus too vague.
Actually no, I believe "bus" is more common. Indeed, you could have the
same IP, attached to a different interconnect I guess.
> >> /*
> >> * Link Xenon specific mmc_host_ops function,
> >> @@ -491,9 +493,20 @@ static int xenon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> if (err)
> >> goto free_pltfm;
> >>
> >> + priv->axi_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "axi");
> >> + if (IS_ERR(priv->axi_clk)) {
-EPROBE_DEFER handling ?
> >> + err = PTR_ERR(priv->axi_clk);
> >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to setup axi clk: %d\n", err);
> >
> > Since the bus clock is optional, can we remove this err msg?
>
> I will change it in dev_info.
This clock is optional (in order to keep DT backward compatibility), so
there shouldn't be any error message, be it dev_err() or dev_info().
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
