On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:52:06PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> Add support for r8a7743/5 SoC.Renesas RZ/G1[ME] (R8A7743/5) SDHI
> is identical to the R-Car Gen2 family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> DT binding patch for r8a7743/5 SoC is applied for mmc next. But the driver patch
> is still not applied for mmc next.So resending the driver patch.
Didn't Chris Paterson volunteer to write a new patch introducing Gen2
generic compatibles? Or did I misunderstand?
>
> This patch is compiled and tested against mmc/next.
>
> drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_sys_dmac.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_sys_dmac.c b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_sys_dmac.c
> index 160fbb2..df44654 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_sys_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_sys_dmac.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@
> { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r7s72100", .data = &of_rz_compatible, },
> { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7778", .data = &of_rcar_gen1_compatible, },
> { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7779", .data = &of_rcar_gen1_compatible, },
> + { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7743", .data = &of_rcar_gen2_compatible, },
> + { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7745", .data = &of_rcar_gen2_compatible, },
> { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7790", .data = &of_rcar_gen2_compatible, },
> { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7791", .data = &of_rcar_gen2_compatible, },
> { .compatible = "renesas,sdhi-r8a7792", .data = &of_rcar_gen2_compatible, },
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
