Hi Wolfram-san, > -----Original Message----- > From: Wolfram Sang > Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:39 PM > > > I and Dung-san are testing this patch. > > However, this original code doesn't run by our test cases. > > Do you know how this original code runs? > > Anyway, we will try to make a test case somehow now. > > Thank you very much, Shimoda-san. I got it tested because a card needed > re-tuning during a transfer. > > It might work if you manually induce an error bit in the driver > somewhere. I'll try to find a good sport later, too. However, I am away > from my boards today and tomorrow. We tested this patch on H3 Salvator-X. If we add debug code in this driver (e.g. 400th mmc request assumes an error), this original code ran and the following message output: =============== [ 258.245349] mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU08G 7.40 GiB [ 258.259245] mmcblk1: p1 [ 268.513997] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD12) [ 273.633998] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD12) [ 278.754000] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD12) [ 283.873995] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD12) [ 288.994000] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD12) [ 289.042012] mmcblk1: error -110 sending stop command =============== And then, after we applied this patch, no regression happens and the following message output: =============== [ 66.433902] mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU08G 7.40 GiB [ 66.449161] mmcblk1: p1 [ 66.505322] mmcblk1: error -110 sending stop command =============== So, Tested-by: Nguyen Viet Dung <dung.nguyen.aj@xxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
