Hi, On 02/10/2017 08:35 PM, Tomas Melin wrote: > Hi, > > It looks as this RFC was never posted as a real patch. > For embedded devices with several memory devices, some being removable, > providing a way to define aliases for the nodes in the device tree is a benefit. > I have tested the patch from Jaehoon and it works nicely. I'm not sure there is more better solution than this. But I guess it's useful to someone.. If someone want to use this, i will resend the patch based on latest mmc. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > Could this be reposted and considered for inclusion? > > Found the original patch here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8685711/ > > Best Regards > Tomas > > > On 04/04/2016 09:14 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 4 April 2016 at 04:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Are there any other opinion for this RFC patch? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Jaehoon Chung >>> >>> On 03/30/2016 09:15 AM, Shawn Lin wrote: >>>> 在 2016/3/29 18:49, Jisheng Zhang 写é“: >>>>> Hi Jaehoon, >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:43:34 +0900 Jaehoon Chung wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This patch is just RFC. I want to know opinions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, index of mmcblk is allocated in accordance with probing time. >>>>>> If want to use the mmcblk1 for some device, it can use alias. >>>>>> >>>>>> aliases { >>>>>> mmc0 = &mmc0; /* mmcblk0 for eMMC */ >>>>>> mmc1 = &mmc2; /* mmcblk1 for SD */ >>>>>> mmc2 = &mmc1; /* mmcblk2 for SDIO*/ >>>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> I like this feature and we do need it. In the past, we have to put emmc dt node >>>>> before the sd node, but on our platform, the register base of sdhc host for > emmc >>>>> is higher than the one for sd, putting emmc dt node before sd looks a bit >>>>> strange, but we have no better solutions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> :) That is also what I suffered currently. I have to prepare two >>>> seperate firmware with two diff fstab files to assign the mount point >>>> since sometime I need to boot from sd, but sometimes from emmc.... >>>> With this patch, I only need to dtc a new dtb... quite simple. >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jisheng >> >> I am not immediately opposed to this patch, although let me think a >> bit more about it. >> >> What I would like to understand is why UUID/PARTUUID isn't working for >> your case. Did you try to use that? > > I have used with UUID/PARTUUID/PARTLABEL and etc.. I think it's not problem. > But that is why some guys wants to use the fixed index. > (Almost all SoCs are still using "root=mmcblk0pX" in bootloader.) > > I'm considering more what is better. :) > > Best Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > >> >> Kind regards >> Uffe >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
