On 13 January 2017 at 12:05, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Regressions for not being able to detect an eMMC HS DDR mode card has been
> reported for the sdhci-esdhc-imx driver, but potentially other sdhci
> variants may suffer from the similar problem.
>
> The commit e173f8911f09 ("mmc: core: Update CMD13 polling policy when
> switch to HS DDR mode"), is causing the problem. It seems that change moved
> one step to far, regarding changing the host's timing before polling for a
> busy card.
>
> To fix this, let's move back to the behaviour when the host's timing is
> updated after the polling, but before the switch status is fetched and
> validated.
>
> In cases when polling with CMD13, we keep validating the switch status at
> each attempt. However, to align with the other card busy detections
> mechanism, let's fetch and validate the switch status also after the host's
> timing is updated.
>
> Reported-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: e173f8911f09 ("mmc: core: Update CMD13 polling policy when switch..")
> Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied for fixes! Thanks everybody for reviews and tests!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> index db2969f..fe80f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> @@ -506,9 +506,6 @@ static int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> }
> } while (busy);
>
> - if (host->ops->card_busy && send_status)
> - return mmc_switch_status(card);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -577,24 +574,26 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value,
> if (!use_busy_signal)
> goto out;
>
> - /* Switch to new timing before poll and check switch status. */
> - if (timing)
> - mmc_set_timing(host, timing);
> -
> /*If SPI or used HW busy detection above, then we don't need to poll. */
> if (((host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY) && use_r1b_resp) ||
> - mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
> - if (send_status)
> - err = mmc_switch_status(card);
> + mmc_host_is_spi(host))
> goto out_tim;
> - }
>
> /* Let's try to poll to find out when the command is completed. */
> err = mmc_poll_for_busy(card, timeout_ms, send_status, retry_crc_err);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
>
> out_tim:
> - if (err && timing)
> - mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
> + /* Switch to new timing before check switch status. */
> + if (timing)
> + mmc_set_timing(host, timing);
> +
> + if (send_status) {
> + err = mmc_switch_status(card);
> + if (err && timing)
> + mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
> + }
> out:
> mmc_retune_release(host);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
