On 2 December 2016 at 07:17, Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.consulting> wrote: > Some devices have additional pins that control power but need to > asserted separately from reset-gpios using a defined time delay. > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <matt@ranostay.consulting> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.txt | 2 ++ > drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c | 26 +++++++++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.txt > index 88826f7d1d38..703a714201d8 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.txt > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ Optional properties: > at initialization and prior we start the power up procedure of the card. > They will be de-asserted right after the power has been provided to the > card. > +- pwrdn-gpios : contains a list of GPIO specifiers. The pwrdn GPIOs are asserted > + at initialization and prior we start the power up procedure of the card. I think "powerdown-gpios" would be better, as Rob earlier also suggested. Moreover I think the DT doc change be a separate change. This comment applies to the other changes in this series as well. [...] Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
