On 2 November 2016 at 08:26, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The code seems quite simple to maintain the sdio_uart_table, > and the insert/remove port from the table are symmetric. If > the BUG_ON occurs, which means serial_core modify the index > or mess up the port sequence anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied for next! Kind regards Uffe > --- > > drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c b/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c > index 5af6fb9..491c187 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c > @@ -135,8 +135,6 @@ static void sdio_uart_port_remove(struct sdio_uart_port *port) > { > struct sdio_func *func; > > - BUG_ON(sdio_uart_table[port->index] != port); > - > spin_lock(&sdio_uart_table_lock); > sdio_uart_table[port->index] = NULL; > spin_unlock(&sdio_uart_table_lock); > -- > 2.3.7 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html