On 2 November 2016 at 08:26, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The code seems quite simple to maintain the sdio_uart_table,
> and the insert/remove port from the table are symmetric. If
> the BUG_ON occurs, which means serial_core modify the index
> or mess up the port sequence anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied for next!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c b/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c
> index 5af6fb9..491c187 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c
> @@ -135,8 +135,6 @@ static void sdio_uart_port_remove(struct sdio_uart_port *port)
> {
> struct sdio_func *func;
>
> - BUG_ON(sdio_uart_table[port->index] != port);
> -
> spin_lock(&sdio_uart_table_lock);
> sdio_uart_table[port->index] = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&sdio_uart_table_lock);
> --
> 2.3.7
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
