On 11/24/2016 06:50 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Maya Erez <qca_merez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Did i send the acked-by tag? :) >> I just agreed some this patch's points. >> When i become assured, i will send the acked-by tag. is this way right? > > As per Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12: > > -------------------------- > Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker > has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch > mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me" > into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an > explicit ack). > --------------------------- Thanks for sharing this information..i didn't read this documentation. Anyway, until today, i have checked the I/O performance with Exynos3/4/5 boards which i have. It seems that there is no I/O performance benefit about packed command at this time. I don't know how other guys are thinking. Explicit.. Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
