On 22 November 2016 at 17:37, Zach Brown <zach.brown@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:27:29AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> Please try to not forget to bump the version number and to provide a >> history of the what changes between revisions. It makes life easier >> when reviewing and when I am about to apply patches. >> > > Sorry, I'll make sure to include a history. > When switching from RFC to PATCH should the version number of the PATCH > be 1 or the lastest RFC version plus 1? Or does it not matter either way RFC + 1, that would be best. Although it doesn't matter that much. > as long as the history is present? Yes, this is the most important part. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
