Hi Shawn, On 10/18/2016 08:35 PM, Shawn Lin wrote: > 在 2016/10/18 16:46, Ulf Hansson 写道: >> + Heiko >> >> On 12 October 2016 at 04:50, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jaehoon and Ulf, I applied this on my repository. If there are any issue, let me know. And minor issue can be fixed..step by step. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung >>> >>> This patch is gonna support runtime PM for dw_mmc. >>> It could support to disable ciu_clk by default and disable >>> biu_clk if the devices are non-removeable, or removeable >>> with gpio-base card detect. >>> >>> Then I remove the system PM since the runtime PM actually >>> does the same thing as it. So I help migrate the dw_mmc variant >>> drivers to use runtime PM pairs and pm_runtime_force_*. Note >>> that I only enable runtime PM for dw_mmc-rockchip as I will >>> leave the decision to the owners of the corresponding drivers. >>> I just tested it on my RK3288 platform with linux-next to make >>> the runtime PM and system PM work fine for my emmc, sd card and >>> sdio. But I don't have hardware to help test other variant drivers. >>> But in theory it should work fine as I mentioned that the runtime >>> PM does the same thing as system PM except for disabling ciu_clk >>> aggressively which should not be related to the variant hosts. >>> >>> As you could see that I just extend the slot-gpio a bit, so the >>> ideal way is Ulf could pick them up with Jaehoon's ack. :) >> >> The mmc core change looks fine to me, so I will wait for a pull >> request from Jaehoon. >> >>> >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - use struct device as argument for runtime callback >>> - use dw_mci_runtime_* directly >>> - use dw_mci_runtime_* directly >>> - minor fix since I change the argument for dw_mci_runtime_* >>> - use dw_mci_runtime_* directly >>> - use dw_mci_runtime_* directly >>> >>> Shawn Lin (9): >>> mmc: dw_mmc: add runtime PM callback >>> mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: add runtime PM support >>> mmc: core: expose the capability of gpio card detect >>> mmc: dw_mmc: disable biu clk if possible >>> mmc: dw_mmc-k3: deploy runtime PM facilities >>> mmc: dw_mmc-exynos: deploy runtime PM facilities >>> mmc: dw_mmc-pci: deploy runtime PM facilities >>> mmc: dw_mmc-pltfm: deploy runtime PM facilities >>> mmc: dw_mmc: remove system PM callback >>> >>> drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c | 8 +++++++ >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 24 +++++++++----------- >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 39 ++++++++------------------------ >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pci.c | 29 ++++++++---------------- >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-pltfm.c | 28 +++++++---------------- >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 6 ++--- >>> include/linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h | 1 + >>> 9 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Overall these changes looks good to me, so I am ready to accept the PR >> from Jaehoon!! >> >> >> Although, highly related to this patchset, I am worried that there is >> a misunderstanding on how MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER (DT binding >> "keep-power-in-suspend") is being used for dw_mmc. Perhaps I am wrong, >> but I would appreciate if you could elaborate a bit for my >> understanding. >> >> First, this cap is solely intended to be used for controllers which >> may have SDIO cards attached, as it indicates those cards may be >> configured to be powered on while the system enters suspend state. By >> looking at some DTS files, for example >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-orion-r68-meta.dts which uses it >> for an eMMC slot, this is clearly being abused. > > Indeed. In general, it should be copy-paste issues as folks maybe write > their dts referring to the exist dts there. So yes, I will do some cleanup work for them in prevent of further spread of abused code. > >> >> Anyway, the wrong DT configurations might not be a big deal, as in >> dw_mci_resume(), it's not the capabilities bit that is checked but the >> corresponding "pm_flag". This flag is set via calling >> sdio_set_host_pm_flags(), but as that doesn't happen for an eMMC card >> we should be fine, right!? >> >> Now, what also do puzzles me, is exactly that piece of code in >> dw_mci_resume() that is being executed *when* the pm_flag contains >> MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER: >> if (slot->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER) { >> dw_mci_set_ios(slot->mmc, &slot->mmc->ios); >> dw_mci_setup_bus(slot, true); >> } >> >> So, in the system resume path, the above do makes sense as you need to >> restore the registers etc for the dw_mmc controller to enable it to >> operate the SDIO card. Such as bus width, clocks, etc. >> >> Although, I would expect something similar would be needed in the new >> runtime resume path as well. And in particular also for eMMC/SD cards, >> as you need to restore the dw_mmc registers to be able to operate the >> card again. Don't you? > > yes, we do. > >> >> So in the end, perhaps you should *always* call dw_mci_set_ios() and >> dw_mci_setup_bus() in dw_mci_resume() instead of conditionally check >> for MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER? Or maybe only a subset of those functions? >> > > Thanks for noticing this. > > Personally, I realize there is no need to check MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER but > it could be highly related to the cost of S-2-R, I guess. I just checked > sdhci and saw the similar cases you mentioned at the first glance. > Maybe I'm wrong but I need more time to investigate this issue later. > > There are still some on-going cleanup work for dw_mmc listed on my TODO > list, including bugfix, legacy/redundant code etc.. So I will check this one either. Maybe Jaehoon could also do some stree test on enxyos > platforms. :) > > >> Kind regards >> Uffe >> >> >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html