On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Aaron Brice <aaron.brice@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - The DMA error interrupt bit is in a different position as
> compared to the sdhci standard. This is accounted for in
> many cases, but not handled in the case of clearing the
> INT_STATUS register by writing a 1 to that location.
> - The HOST_CONTROL register is very different as compared to
> the sdhci standard. This is accounted for in the write
> case, but not when read back out (which it is in the sdhci
> code).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Russell <david.russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Brice <aaron.brice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 1f54fd8..d61ef16 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -346,7 +346,8 @@ static void esdhc_writel_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val, int reg)
> struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> u32 data;
>
> - if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_INT_ENABLE || reg == SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE)) {
> + if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_INT_ENABLE || reg == SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE ||
> + reg == SDHCI_INT_STATUS)) {
> if ((val & SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT) && !esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> /*
> * Clear and then set D3CD bit to avoid missing the
> @@ -555,6 +556,25 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
> esdhc_clrset_le(host, 0xffff, val, reg);
> }
>
> +static u8 esdhc_readb_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
> +{
> + u8 ret;
> + u32 long_val;
> +
> + switch (reg) {
> + case SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL:
> + long_val = readl(host->ioaddr + reg);
> +
> + ret = long_val & SDHCI_CTRL_LED;
> + ret |= (long_val >> 5) & SDHCI_CTRL_DMA_MASK;
> + ret |= (long_val & ESDHC_CTRL_4BITBUS);
> + ret |= (long_val & ESDHC_CTRL_8BITBUS) << 3;
> + return ret;
Thanks for the effort.
One nitpick: would be more like to use 'val' instead of 'long_val' to
be consistent with exist using.
(i saw a few 'new_val' as well, maybe we could clean up them in the future,
but at least we could avoid inventing more from now)
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> + }
> +
> + return readb(host->ioaddr + reg);
> +}
> +
> static void esdhc_writeb_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 val, int reg)
> {
> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> @@ -947,6 +967,7 @@ static void esdhc_set_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = {
> .read_l = esdhc_readl_le,
> .read_w = esdhc_readw_le,
> + .read_b = esdhc_readb_le,
> .write_l = esdhc_writel_le,
> .write_w = esdhc_writew_le,
> .write_b = esdhc_writeb_le,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
